National Route 275 Numata Town Numata Guardrail Installation and Other Integrated Works

National Route 275 Numata Town Numata Guardrail Installation and Other Integrated Works
- 1 - "Expanded General Competitive Tender, Comprehensive Evaluation and Award System, Construction System Confirmation Type, Prior Examination Construction Capability Evaluation Type I, Simultaneous Submission, Public Notice for Public Announcement, Electronic Contract" TENDER NOTICE (Construction Work) Tenders will be invited as follows. July 10, 2026 Authorized Officer for Expenditure, Hokkaido Development Bureau, Sapporo Development and Construction Department, Hirayama Daisuke 1. Outline of Work (1) Name of Work: National Route 275 Numata Town Numata Guardrail Installation and Other Integrated Works (Electronic Bidding Target Project) (Electronic Contract Target Project) (2) Location of Work: Numata Town, Uryu District, Hokkaido, etc. (3) Description of Work: This work involves widening the road shoulder and repairing the pavement on National Route 275 in Numata Town as a traffic accident countermeasure. It also includes pavement repair work on National Route 233 in Horonobe Town. (Main Construction Types) (Sub-Construction Types) (Quantities) [Numata Work Section] Work Length: L=1,600m 1) Roadwork: Excavation (ICT) V≒ 410m3 Embankment and Roadbed Fill V≒ 200m3 2) Slope Work: Sodding (Live Sod) A≒1,580m2 3) Pavement Work: Roadbed Work A≒1,160m2 Asphalt Pavement Work A≒3,440m2 Road Surface Milling Work A≒2,790m2 4) Guardrail Work: Guardrail (Gr-B3-3E) L≒ 93m 5) Lane Marking Work: Paint Lane Marking L≒1,400m [Horonobe Work Section] Work Length: L=1,100m 1) Pavement Work: Asphalt Pavement Work A≒6,440m2 Road Surface Milling Work A≒6,440m2 2) Lane Marking Work: Paint Lane Marking L≒2,300m (4) Contract Period: From the day after the contract conclusion date to March 5, 2027 (5) Construction Period and Other Conditions: Other Conditions: One-way alternating traffic control (daytime construction) (6) For this work, submission of documents, bidding, etc., will be conducted through the electronic bidding system. However, if it is difficult to use the electronic bidding system, paper bidding may be substituted with the approval of the contracting authority. - 2 - (7) This work is subject to the electronic contract system for the exchange of documents related to contract procedures. However, if it is difficult to use the electronic contract system, the paper contract system may be substituted with the approval of the contracting authority. (8) This work is a trial project using the comprehensive evaluation and award system (construction capability evaluation type I), where only the application form is received at the time of submitting the application for confirmation of competitive participation qualifications (hereinafter referred to as "application form"), and the confirmation documents for competitive participation qualifications (hereinafter referred to as "documents") and the construction plan are accepted at the time of bidding, and the successful bidder is determined by comprehensively evaluating non-price factors and price. (9) This work requires simultaneous submission of the tender form, documents, and construction plan. (10) This work is a trial project using the construction system confirmation type comprehensive evaluation and award system, which confirms the quality assurance system and other construction system assurance status, and evaluates whether the construction content can be reliably realized. (11) This work is subject to the obligation of separate demolition, etc., and recycling of specified construction materials, etc., based on the "Act on the Recycling of Construction Materials, etc." (Act No. 104 of 2000). (12) This work is a trial project where the contracting authority distributes the construction cost breakdown. (13) Application of the Lump-Sum Contract Unit Price Agreement Method a. This work is subject to the "Lump-Sum Contract Unit Price Agreement Method". To facilitate smooth negotiations for contract changes, etc., unit prices, etc., as breakdowns of the lump-sum contract will be agreed upon through consultation between the contracting parties after the contract conclusion. b. The implementation methods for this system include (a) individual unit price agreement method (a method where unit prices for each breakdown in the construction quantity summary table (or amount for lump-sum items; same in (b)) are calculated and then agreed upon) and (b) comprehensive unit price agreement method (a method where agreement is reached on each amount obtained by multiplying the unit price for each breakdown in the construction quantity summary table by the contract price ratio). The contractor shall choose one of these methods. However, if the individual unit price agreement method is chosen by the contractor and an agreement is not reached within 14 days from the date of commencement of consultation, the comprehensive unit price agreement method shall be applied. c. If the contractor chooses the "comprehensive unit price agreement method", they shall submit the "Request for Comprehensive Unit Price Agreement Method" sent by the contract担当課 after the contract conclusion, with the necessary information filled in, to the contract担当課 within 14 days after the contract conclusion. d. Other: The implementation procedures for this method shall be in accordance with the "Implementation Guidelines for Lump-Sum Contract Unit Price Agreement Method" and the "Explanation of Implementation Guidelines for Lump-Sum Contract Unit Price Agreement Method". (14) This work is a trial project of the "Technologist Development Type (Young Technologist Type: Relaxation)" where the evaluation items of "Hokkaido Development Bureau Director's Award for Excellent Construction" and "Construction Supervisor (Chief) Technician's Construction Performance" are excluded, in consideration of the participation of young technicians. (15) This work involves construction sites scattered in various locations, and the common temporary work costs and site management costs are calculated for each of the "Numata Work Section" and "Horonobe Work Section". (16) This work is an ICT utilization construction project (contractor's preferred type II) that fully utilizes ICT based on i-Construction advocated by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, by utilizing 3D data for preliminary surveys, review of design documents, construction, progress management, inspection, and completion drawings and construction management records and related documents through the contractor's proposals and consultations. - 3 - (17) This work is a new technology utilization project where the contractor selects and utilizes one or more new technologies. (18) This work is a trial project for "Productivity Improvement Challenge" that promotes initiatives for productivity improvement through ingenuity in construction procedures proposed by the contractor. (19) This work is a project that provides additional points in the comprehensive evaluation for companies that implement wage increases. (20) This work is a trial project for "Hokkaido Infrastructure Zero Carbon" that promotes initiatives contributing to carbon neutrality proposed by the contractor. (21) This work is a trial project for "AI Utilization in Hokkaido's Infrastructure Field" that promotes initiatives contributing to AI utilization in the infrastructure field proposed by the contractor. (22) This work is a trial project (contractor's preferred method) to investigate the actual conditions of wages, working hours, and labor costs, in cooperation with the contractor, regarding wage payments to subcontractors and ensuring appropriate working hours. 2. Competitive Participation Qualifications Any person who meets all of the following conditions, or an ongoing construction joint venture composed of such persons, and has received a determination of tender participation qualification from the Director-General of the Hokkaido Development Bureau. (1) Not falling under the provisions of Articles 70 and 71 of the Budget, Expenditure, and Accounting Order (Imperial Ordinance No. 165 of 1947; hereinafter referred to as the "Order"). (2) Must have received a determination of A rank, B rank, or special B rank (rankings recognized as transitional measures due to changes in the competitive environment in the general competitive (designated competitive) tender qualifications for fiscal years 2025 and 2026; hereinafter the same) for the "Pavement" construction category in the Hokkaido Development Bureau, or have received a determination of A rank as an ongoing construction joint venture. However, if a B rank or special B rank contractor participates in the competition, the technical evaluation score for "Pavement" must be 650 points or higher. Furthermore, if an ongoing construction joint venture has received an A rank determination for the general competitive (designated competitive) tender qualifications mentioned above and wishes to participate in the competition with the Sapporo Development and Construction Department as an ongoing construction joint venture, it cannot participate as an individual company (except when it cannot participate as an ongoing construction joint venture due to a suspension of designation imposed on another member of the ongoing construction joint venture). In addition, for companies that have filed for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings under the Corporate Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 154 of 2002) or for companies that have filed for commencement of reconstruction proceedings under the Civil Reconstruction Act (Act No. 225 of 1999), a new determination of general competitive (designated competitive) tender qualifications must have been received in accordance with procedures separately established by the Director-General of the Hokkaido Development Bureau after the decision to commence proceedings. (3) Not a company that has filed for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings under the Corporate Rehabilitation Act or for commencement of reconstruction proceedings under the Civil Reconstruction Act (excluding those who have received the redetermination mentioned in (2) above). (4) Must have experience in constructing works that meet either of the following requirements as the prime contractor from April 1, 2011, to the announcement date (experience as a member of a joint venture is limited to cases where the contribution ratio is 20% or more). However, in the case of an ongoing construction joint venture, the joint venture itself or one of its members must have the above construction experience (experience as a member of a joint venture is limited to cases where the contribution ratio is 20% or more). Furthermore, for works commissioned by the Hokkaido Development Bureau, the Minister's Secretariat, Government Buildings Department, and Regional Development Bureaus, works with a total evaluation score of less than 65 points are excluded. i. [Same Type of Work Condition] Must have experience in asphalt pavement work accompanied by traffic control on roads under the Road Act. (Attach documentation to confirm construction experience.) ii. [More Similar Type of Work Condition] Must have experience in asphalt pavement work accompanied by traffic control on high-standard trunk roads or general national routes. (Attach documentation to confirm construction experience.) (5) Construction plan must be appropriate. (6) A chief technician or supervising engineer who meets the following criteria must be assigned to this work on a full-time basis. However, if currently engaged in other work, the technician must be able to be assigned to this work within approximately 7 days from the award decision date. Furthermore, if applicable under Article 26, Paragraph 3, Proviso, and Article 27, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Industry Act, the technician must be full-time; however, if all requirements of Article 26, Paragraph 3, Item 1 of the Construction Industry Act are met, they may concurrently serve in other works, and if all requirements of Article 26-5, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Industry Act are met, they may concurrently serve as an office technician or a specific office technician. Details regarding concurrent service shall be in accordance with relevant laws and regulations. The contractor may change the chief technician or supervising engineer through consultation with the supervisor if it is deemed that there is no impediment to the continuity of the work. a. Must be a Class 1 Civil Engineering Construction Management Engineer or possess equivalent or higher qualifications. However, in the case of an ongoing construction joint venture, one of the members must assign a person with the above qualifications, and other members must assign a chief technician with a Class 2 or higher national qualification. b. Must have experience in the works described in the main text of (4) above from April 1, 2011, to the announcement date. However, in the case of an ongoing construction joint venture, the supervising engineer must have experience in the works described in the main text of (4) above. If a supervising engineer is not required, it is sufficient if the chief technician of any one of the members has experience in the works described in the main text of (4) above (experience as a member of a joint venture is limited to cases where the contribution ratio is 20% or more). Furthermore, for experience in works commissioned by the Hokkaido Development Bureau, the Minister's Secretariat, Government Buildings Department, and Regional Development Bureaus, works with a total evaluation score of less than 65 points are excluded. c. For supervising engineers, must possess a supervising engineer's license and a certificate of completion of supervising engineer training. (7) Not subject to suspension of designation under the Hokkaido Development Bureau's Measures for Suspension of Designation, etc., for Construction Contracts, etc. (Hokkaihatsu-ko No. 1, April 1, 1985) during the period from the application submission deadline to the bid opening (for joint ventures, all members must not be subject to suspension). (8) Must have construction performance that meets the following requirements. Furthermore, if there is only one year of order実績, the average construction performance evaluation score for that year will be used. For individual companies or members of joint ventures without the order実績 mentioned in a. or b., the construction performance evaluation score will be 65 points. a. Individual: The average construction performance evaluation score for Hokkaido Development Bureau commissioned works completed in fiscal years 2023 and 2024 must be 65 points or higher. If there is no order実績 in the above years, the average construction performance evaluation score for Hokkaido Development Bureau commissioned works completed in fiscal years 2021 and 2022 must be 65 points or higher. b. Joint Venture: The average construction performance evaluation score for Hokkaido Development Bureau commissioned works completed in fiscal years 2023 and 2024 for all members must be 65 points or higher. If there is no order実績 in the above years for a member, the average construction performance evaluation score for Hokkaido Development Bureau commissioned works completed in fiscal years 2021 and 2022 will be used, and the average for all members must be 65 points or higher. (9) Not a contractor who received design services for the work described in 1 above, or a construction company with capital or personnel relationships with such a contractor. (10) No capital or personnel relationship between bidders. (Refer to the tender documents) (11) Must have a head office, branch office, or business office in Hokkaido that has obtained the construction industry permit necessary for carrying out this work (for joint ventures, all members must have one). (12) Not a person who is identified by the police authorities as being substantially controlled by a gangster or equivalent, and for whom a request for exclusion from Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism public works projects has been made and continues to be in effect. (13) This work permits the assignment of a supervising engineer to whom Article 26, Paragraph 3, Item 2 of the Construction Industry Act applies. (Refer to the tender documents) 3. Matters Concerning the Comprehensive Evaluation and Award System (1) Method of Comprehensive Evaluation The successful bidder for this work will be determined by the following method. a. A "standard score" of 100 points will be awarded if the competitive participation qualifications indicated in the tender documents are met. b. A maximum of 37 points of "additional score" will be awarded based on the experience and construction plan shown in the documents. The evaluation items are as follows: (a) Matters related to the construction plan (b) Matters related to the company's construction capability (c) Matters related to the ability of the assigned technician (d) Matters related to regional familiarity (e) Matters related to regional contribution (f) Statement of wage increase implementation. c. Deductions will be made for past measures that apply. The evaluation items are as follows: (a) Suspension of designation (b) Written warning (c) Verbal warning. d. Deductions will be made for past construction performance that applies. The evaluation items are as follows: Repair requests, etc. e. An "construction system evaluation score" of up to 30 points will be awarded after examining the quality assurance system and the certainty of construction system assurance. The evaluation items are as follows: (a) Effectiveness of quality assurance (b) Certainty of construction system assurance. f. The successful bidder will be determined using the value calculated by dividing the total of the obtained "standard score", "additional score", "deduction", and "construction system evaluation score" by the bidder's tender price (hereinafter referred to as the "evaluation value"). The outline is shown below, but specific technical requirements, evaluation criteria for bidding, etc., will be clearly stated in the tender documents. (2) Determination of Successful Bidder Bidders will submit bids based on price. For bidders whose bid price is within the range of the estimated price, the evaluation value will be calculated by dividing the sum of the "standard score", "additional score", and "deduction" (plus the "construction system evaluation score") by the bid price.